Apple’s Message to Local News: If Your Viewers are Running Away, Why Not Follow Them?
When you watch an Apple “event”—that’s what they call them, you know—as I did today, you get the brain-stretching feeling that you are getting a glimpse of the new way you’ll be doing something. The new way that, before long, will feel very, very normal.
Remember the debut of the iPod. Launched in 2001—doesn’t it feel like they’ve been in your life a lot longer than that?—the iPod quickly dominated the brand new category of digital music players. Now you’ve got one, I’ve got one (three, I think) and looking back, Apple reinvented everything.
But think of what the executives in the music industry must’ve been thinking back in 2001. “Huh? Apple’s doing what? Music? Yeah, right. We do music. No worries.”
Well, 11.7 billion music downloads later, Apple’s still so far ahead of the thinking curve, that the music industry itself seems like a group of lumbering dinosaurs in comparison. In fact today, just to run up the score, Apple unveiled a Facebook-style social networking site embedded into the new version of iTunes. It will inevitably blow up and become another new essential--a new way we learn about and enjoy music with our friends, and Sony or somebody will try to copy it and… well, you know.
Now switch the characters in this story to television. The old media companies don’t think like the engineers in Cupertino. They can’t seem to think beyond the legacy model. Television stations, networks, we bring you to the set, you watch, we sell your eyeballs to advertisers.
Only that's just not going to remain viable for long. Viewers are walking—many are running—away. And Apple is one of the forward-thinking companies that wants to be where the audience is, rather than trying to figure out how to get the audience back to where it used to be.
So here comes AppleTV, which will allow me to bring Netflix directly to my big-screen HDTV in my living room, or to quickly dial up an episode of Mad Men from iTunes.
Where’s the traditional network model, with programming schedules and local affiliates fit into that? In a word? Nowhere. I don’t watch anything live anymore except news and sports. And if I could find a way to get those on demand via Apple instead of Cablevision? If I could dial up and pay to stream just the game I want, whether it's the New York Jets or maybe an Italian Serie A game? Well, I'd prefer that to the hundreds of channels of crap I pay for, but never watch on cable.
As it is now, dramas, reality, 30 Rock—they all get recorded on the clunky piece of garbage DVR I pay my horrifically lousy cable company for, and more times than I can believe, the DVR messes up, or the drive gets overloaded and it stops recording my shows, or I become infuriated trying to navigate the PC-style menus in the DVR “guide” (three buttons to push for "delete" and honest to God the DVR prompts you upon turning on the TV to "hit any key to watch TV.") and I throw remote, DVR and even my TV out the window.
But in four weeks I’ll have AppleTV. And it makes me wonder—where does local news fit in? If I’m one step closer to cutting ties with cable, I can see into the future and clearly understand how I’ll watch television. Top Chef and Breaking Bad will come from Netflix or iTunes, right through the AppleTV box whenever I want, and right onto my big TV. No computer needed.
What I don’t know yet is where my live football will come from, or where my local news will come from.
If you’re in local news, it’s a question that needs to be pondered. If technology begins moving away from you, and it’s going where the viewers are, you need to think long and hard about getting there too.
Don’t be the guy still making cassettes for use in a Sony Walkman, you know?
Dusty Trice, a Saint Paul, Minnesota-based new media guru and political consultant watched Apple’s “event” as well. And he says the bottom line for old media companies is brutally simple: “AppleTV is about to kill Blu-Ray and mortally wound cable. The content is king, not the medium.”

Watching Apple's "Event" Live, Streaming, on my iPad While Tweeting the News. No Traditional Media Anywhere in the Mix.
Local news, despite every advantage early on in adopting and exploiting the potential of the web, has remained dug in deep to the medium: television.
“I think the lesson here is that the outdated traditional content distribution models will need to adapt or die out,” Trice says. “It’s their choice.”
So far, a few flashy websites and iPhone apps notwithstanding, local television stations and local newspapers have not done a great job of escaping their medium. They just want to use the new media to grab the audience and drive them back home.
TV stations use Facebook and Twitter and the web to shout: come and watch our six o’clock news, everybody! Hey, our morning show is now on at 4:30 a.m.! C’mon, you know you’re too busy in the a.m. making coffee and getting dressed to surf the net, right? So flip on good ol’ Channel 6—just like the good ol’ days!
And the audience keeps moving away—or dying.
“The trick with content distribution is going to be meeting the consumer where they choose to consume their content and not telling them where they have to consume their content,” says Trice. “If the bulk of the audience is on iPhones and iPads, I’d worry about making content available on those devices. The consumer has evolved and moved outside the home. Distributors need to innovate and do the same.”
Right now, I get my local weather from a nifty and fun-to-use Weather Channel app on my iPad (complete with animated maps, local alerts, and video). I check it at night and again in the morning. The idea of waiting for local TV to give me the forecast sounds like an epic time waster.
I get my news online and ever more frequently, on my phone and iPad. Right now, it’s an environment where I don’t see any big settlements from local news.
Huffington Post is a bigger local news player in this world than the dominant television stations of decades past. What does that tell you?
Where do you want to be?



September 1st, 2010 - 16:47
Great observations, Mark.
One unrelated to news note, WTF — no more video playback on the iPod nano???
September 1st, 2010 - 17:09
I didn’t notice that! Might just be too small?
September 1st, 2010 - 19:40
Wonder if stations will start doing a morning, noon and evening 10 minute newscast and post it on iTunes or whatever Apple creates for time sensitive content. The question is will local TV figure it out before others steal absolutely all of their viewers.
September 1st, 2010 - 20:30
Tom, that’s an interesting idea… like a regularly posted “live” video podcast via iTunes and available for streaming onto my HDTV via AppleTV. I could get into that. Question is… how do stations own breaking news?
But the key… people at stations need to be brainstorming this stuff. Glad to have your input.
September 1st, 2010 - 21:05
Mark,
I’ve owned the apple tv (1st gen) for just over a year now and had gotten rid of cable and the tv antenna 3 years ago. Devices like th iPad and apple tv have provided me with (almost) all the content i like to watch, minus the Daily Show and discovery. In terms of local news, i wonder if the lagging behind has to do not only with the size of the companies that run the stations (and not wanting to invest in the man power or equipment necessary), but also with the businesses which they serve. In many smaller markets, the total eyeballs probably aren’t enough to justify the price for local spend instead of tv. The tv model has also shot itself in the foot by initially treating a lot of their web products whether that’s preroll video or banners as ” added value” when trying to close a tv buy. Tough to put the genie back in the bottle. Finally, the biggest thing, is if your not putting the content in a package where i like to see it, as in a podcast, rss, or app form, I’m proabaly not going to take the time to log on to mh local news station each day to watch.
September 1st, 2010 - 21:41
Ryan, You are dead on. I’m so excited about the idea of killing off my cable. And I totally agree with you that the only hesitant efforts local stations have made to get where the viewers are going–mobile or app–have seemed exactly like “add ons.” Perfect way to describe it. What I’ve come to expect with my iPhone and iPad is solid, deep content, updated at any hour… and with the kind of click through multiplatform depth to keep taking me deeper into a story. Instead, I get shallow and limited…often, it’s merely a quick web version of an already-aired TV story. The more I use mobile devices for news, the less tolerant I am of anything that feels dated–and by dated I mean not right now.
Thanks for taking the time to share a great comment.
Mark
September 1st, 2010 - 23:02
I don’t own Apple TV and already do all this through a PC and a PS3 hooked up to my Monolith…and have for years. Netflix and Hulu are my mainstays.
That said, I’m thinking it may be the other way around…wounding Blu Ray and killing cable. The cable companies will transform into pure ISP (assuming they don’t throttle us…remember, we need ISPs to get the Apple TV/Netflix/Itunes/Hulu service, and being heavily invested in the cable side of things, are going to try nasty tricks to protect that investment). However, the resolution/lossless audio (which is dependant on your connection) and the “must physically own” types will keep Blu Ray around, even if it winds up being more like laserdisks were and less mainstream.
September 2nd, 2010 - 18:20
Local TV news is dead and long gone. What news that’s left is on the Internet and most of it is not very good. Sadly, television gave up the news mantle long ago. Good night and good luck!
September 3rd, 2010 - 23:31
Fully expect apps run from your iPhone or iPad to work on your tv; stream MLB at bat, etc. The technology is there (A4 chip and iOS4) so all these devices can talk to each other; apple probably just waiting to unveil in January.