KARE/Minneapolis Gives Newsroom's "Heart and Soul" His Pink Slip
You know the guy. He's the guy who's not talent, and not news director, but he somehow makes the trains run on time. The guy who's as good in the morning meeting as he is in the convention center for the massive multi-camera remote. He's the guy who gets good phoners when a breaker happens in the second half-hour of the noon show. He's the guy who takes the news director's new idea and somehow makes it happen--and look good.
At KARE, he was Lonnie Hartley, Senior Executive Producer, workaholic, and as David Brauer writes in his BrauBlog, KARE's "heart and soul." Hartley's 70-hour workweeks earned respect from staff, but apparently meant little when corporate cost-cutters ordered another head to roll Wednesday.
As David Brauer put it: "Insiders say the newsroom had never seemed so shell-shocked as it was today, when a tearful Hartley told his troops goodbye."
It makes you wonder what we're doing to our newsrooms. For years, KARE had the reputation of a real hard news shop, the kind of place young reporters and producers and anchors kept in the backs of their minds: KARE would be a great place to end up.

Those Live Events with Station Signage, Stage, Field Switching and Tarps for Rain Don't Just Happen by Themselves, You Know
But more and more, the gutting behind the scenes (and on the air, of course, with familiar faces vanishing) means stations are losing layer after significant layer; the people who get it done but don't usually get their names in the paper when they get laid off. The truck ops, the veteran photogs, the MacGyvers of local news who mean so much to news staff, but don't register in corporate boardrooms.
Sure, things won't run as well now. More work to spread around, and some of it won't get done. When the chips are down, and it's hitting the fan, maybe magic won't be made like it used to. But with the weekend show a one-anchor, one-backpack-journalist effort, and photogs during the week running on a strict no-overtime policy; with engineering cut back and the assignment desk understaffed and inexperienced...does it really matter?
Hartley told David Brauer "I have a huge passion for news — you know what it's like to break a great story, the fulfillment that comes from that." The sad part is, at places like KARE, that's not the top priority anymore, if it's a priority at all.
But hey, the new corporate graphics package looks nice.
Local Newsers: You've Heard "Feed the Web." But Beware Throwing It Scraps.

KMSP/Minneapolis: Great Story On TV, Not So Hot Online
If you're working at a local news station worth anything, part of your job these days includes reporting for the 5:00, 6:00 and maybe the 11:00 and filing a version of your story for the station website. Maybe you remember, as I do, the emphasis put on this part of the job by your news director in memo after memo after threatening memo: "you must file a story with the web before your day is over," etc.
Some of us take this multiplatforming as a way to reach new audiences and flex new writing muscles (I, for one, love translating my broadcast voice into "print" format for the web, even if sometimes, it seems like rolling a boulder up a hill while riding in a livetruck back to the station at the end of a long day. (Oh man...what was the name of the hotdog vendor we interviewed at noon?) What about leaving the job to an overworked web editor? Ah, my friend, beware.
For that part of today's life lesson, we turn the blog over to WCCO's Jason DeRusha, who not only worked for broadcast and filed for the web, but also responded to a Brooklyn blogger's last-minute request for a guest post. And he offers some damn solid insight into the risks and rewards of telling your story--and keeping control of your story--across all platforms. If you're banging out the web version as an afterthought, or leaving it to someone else, you're playing with your own reputation.
DISPATCH FROM THE FRONTLINES: Jason DeRusha, WCCO-TV/Minneapolis
As a guy who started in Davenport, Iowa in 1997, my job was clear. I was a television news reporter. My job was to go find out stuff and put it on TV. Maybe I'd write a VOSOT for 10, or the morning news. But that was it.
Today, my job is to do work across multiple platforms. I blog, I have webcam a at my desk, I Tweet and I turn my nightly TV news report "Good Question" into a story that can live on the web.
Writing my story for online publication may be the most important and least appreciated part of my job. I learned this a couple years ago, when a Google search of my name turned up a Pacific Business News article ripping me for a story I did where I supposedly referred to Hawaii as the "big island." I did no such thing, on the air. But the online version of my story, published under my byline (and written by a web producer), got it wrong.

Fox 9s Story on Twitter: Great on TV. Online: FAIL.
I bring this up, because a local Minneapolis Fox station took a great deal of heat online for the text version of a perfectly fine TV story. They should have expected that a story on Twitter would get a lot of attention on Twitter. The story I watched on the air was a perfectly nice introduction to Twitter. It was well-written and well produced. The story online was not. No links to the people in the story. No quotes from anyone in the story. With no disrespect intended toward the person who probably had to post two dozen stories that night, it appeared to be written by a child. The story was annihilated online: with Tweets like this: "That Fox Twitter story reads like a piece on the CB Radio craze submitted to me in 1976 when I edited the 6th grade paper." Not good.
At WCCO-TV in Minneapolis, several years ago management decided that reporters and field producers would write their own stories for the web. We had seminars, reminding us that writing for the web is different. Online readers expect you to get to the point right away. On-air, you might build your story to a climactic point. Online readers expect you to cite your sources, specifically. Online readers expect you to link to source material.
WCCO's DeRusha: Live on the Street, Live at his Desk
Some of us are pretty good at this, others need quite a bit of editing. But the web producers can work on editing, rather than trying to figure out what we were talking about when the TV script reads, "SOT: In: bob went.... OUT: pizza parlor." At first, I hated writing my web scripts. It jams more work into the end of my work day. Now, I love it. I love adding the extra information that I had to leave out because of time. I love the challenge of coming up with a provocative headline to attract viewers. And I'm proud of the fact that when people link to my stories, they get a well-written story, under my name, and under my station's brand.
If you wonder about the value of a well-written web story, go to your web team and ask to see some web traffic statistics. I'll bet you the text versions of stories get at least ten times more views than the corresponding videos. And unlink the television story that went out into the ether and disappeared, your online version will live nearly forever. So make it count.
Mysteries of Local TV News: What's With the Bum's Rush?
I must admit this is one I've always been puzzled by: why, when managers decide they're getting rid of someone, does the axe drop so swiftly--without warning in many cases--and the body, still warm, get carted off the premises so damn quickly?
It happened today in Minneapolis. WCCO anchor Jeanette Trompeter thought she'd be doing her regular gig on the anchor desk at 5 p.m. Instead, she got the axe--and ten minutes later, she was shown the door. She was talking to Star-Tribune reporter C.J. a few minutes after that, apologizing for crying about the sudden loss of her job. "I feel like a wimp," she told C.J. "In this economy you're stupid if you're on TV and you don't know it's a possibility. All I've ever asked for was give me a head start to go look for something else. I didn't think I'd have to leave ten minutes after. I thought I'd be doing the five o'clock news tonight."

WCCO's Trompeter
She didn't. Why? "They said, 'you're no longer an employee.'"
Welcome to the Kinder and Gentler Street, where we all know the business is in trouble, and obviously, some cuts will be made. But surely we can do this like professionals and with some degree of tact and grace. Or, maybe it's just easier to jump somebody with their IFB in and their scripts in hand and divert them away from the studio, up to HR, and then out through the loading dock. Maybe that averts a "scene" or an on-air farewell (Heavens no! That would let people know we're a company like other industries where people are being laid off, right?) or maybe just a few days or weeks of having to, you know, work with them.
What's the rush? There are anchors in New York who've been pulled off the air in a flash, only to be sent home to ride out month after month of a contract--cashing the checks, but doing no work. Anybody see the logic of cash-strapped companies paying employees to stay home?
Maybe they just are such lousy local newsers it makes better financial sense to get them out of the building at any cost? Well, not at WCCO. Trompeter says she got this Kafkaesque sendoff: "They said, You're a great employee and this has nothing to do with that. It's a purely financial decision. I just got a great [job] review about three weeks ago."
Ponder that when you're called into the news director's office for that review. You did great! Might want to take your personal photos home just to be safe, though. Never know if they'll let you back to your desk after they fire you.