Local Newsers: What's It Going to Be? Innovate or Die? (Huh? You Sure You Don't Want to Pick "Innovate?")
If you haven't yet read Jeff Jarvis' excellent book, What Would Google Do?, do yourself a favor and pick up a copy.
Jarvis is a new media guru who produces content across multiple platforms (his BuzzMachine blog is required reading, and his new Guardian podcast is fantastic) and teaches digital media at CUNY's Graduate School of Journalism. His book "reverse-engineers" Google to see what secrets we can uncover, and then implement, perhaps fueling a new style of journalism that will keep all of us working into the next decade.
In a discussion of financial models, and how Google transcended them, Jarvis writes: the "winner is likely to be a new player, not one trying to protect old revenue streams and assets." Think about that for a moment. Look at your own company. Is it innovating into the future? Or desperately, blindly, obsessively trying to make what's always worked still work?
In New York last week, News Corp announced its latest round of firings and buyouts, cutting twenty staffers at WNYW and WWOR, cuts that affected traditional news operations and the stations' web team. That jumped out at me. The web, without question, is the future. What does it say about a company making cuts and deciding to pull back on the one area of the business with a clear, huge and critical role in the years ahead?
My answer: they're doing whatever they can do to cut costs and stay alive until the economy improves. Then they'll go back to that internet stuff.

Jeff Jarvis
Jarvis calls this the "Cash Cow in the Coal Mine:" "Cash flow can blind you to the strategic necessity of change, tough decisions, and innovation...How many companies and industries fail to heed the warnings they know are there but refuse to see?"
Local news refuses to see. As Jarvis writes, station owners are losing their "destinies" because they want to "preserve their pasts." And you know it's true. As I've written here, there is incredible innovation happening in the world of video storytelling and news. It's just not being done by television stations. Newspapers are trying new ways of including multimedia content to make their reporting more impactful, interesting and different. In cities across the country, folks are creating web-based newscasts that look nothing like the stuff stations continue to produce--just the way they always have.
Watch this promo for a new Australian newscast that debuts this month. Aside from the cliche-ridden nature of the promo itself, is there anything here that couldn't have been done 25 years ago?
[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nTmNTN5JQXw&feature=player_embedded]
Think about it. What's so different about the six o'clock news? Sure, it starts in some cities at 4. It's shot in HD. And... well, beyond that, it's the same product we've been selling for decades. That reminds me of senior citizens who will buy a new version of the same old car time after time because that's what they like. And looking at the demographics of a lot of news, these are the same reliable viewers keeping some local newscasts alive.
Where's the innovation? What's one new thing that would've been unimaginable to the Action News teams of the 1970's? Doppler radar? That's an improvement of the same old thing. New ways of doing liveshots? What am I missing?
Take the computers out of the newsroom and put typewriters back, replace the cell phones with hard lines, put the AP wire back into a noisy printer in the corner, and go retro with the set, the over-the-shoulder graphics (FIRE!) and men's lapels, and this is the same old cereal in a new box.
It's depressing, when you look at the environment we're in: a once-in-a-career time of change, with a life-or-death incentive to innovate, and yet stations still believe in the tried and true rules of innovation in local news:
1) New Set
2) New Graphics
3) New Anchors
4) New News Director
Seriously, people. News isn't dying. Someone's going to be making money giving our viewers the information they want. But there's no reason to believe it's going to be us.
I guess times are just too tight to risk taking chances. And we'll staff the web team back up when the car dealers start spending again. Sound good? Yeah, that'll work.
Local TV Newsers: Meet Denise. She May Be the Future. She May Eat Your Lunch.

702.tv's Denise Spidle
Reading the story in the Las Vegas Sun, you could forgive a veteran local television reporter for an instinctive chuckle. Oh, aren't they precious! The newspaper people are trying to do TV! They've even gone and bought themselves a red couch and a curtain for a backdrop!
Yeah, you definitely want to laugh it off. But here's the weird thing about 702.tv: it's interesting, it's different, and it's the supposedly-dead medium of print, encroaching--yet again--on TV's turf. It's almost like (am I crazy here?) the print people think they can win the battle for local video online. Nah. That's crazy. We own that!
From the Washington Post, and it's excellent series of video documentaries posted online, to The New York Times' creative and compelling commitment to multi-media storytelling, it's becoming clear the print folk don't want to stay on their side of the fence in what's obviously a deathmatch. There will be local news, of course, and it'll probably be predominantly online at some point, but thinking that we're the experts on video and so obviously it's the papers that have to give up and go home... well, that's a huge mistake.
Think about your TV newsroom. What print tricks have you adopted? Certainly you haven't got bodies in police precincts running through the overnight arrests, and nobody's hanging out in the courthouse checking on interesting lawsuits. That's what newspapers are for, right?
Ah, but you've learned to write in print form for the web! Right? You doctor up your 6 o'clock script into a mock-print style and file it--sorry, feed it--to the website. And what a brilliant website it is, if I know anything about local TV, I'm sure yours is creative, ground-breaking, and chock full of unique uses of video. Right?
Right?
Everybody in town isn't coming out of this alive, folks. And assuming the print people will roll over and play dead just because, you know, the printing press is dead, well, that doesn't seem to be working. Sure, the paper won't be hitting doorsteps like it used to, but those print folk seem so aggressive about getting into our game. And far moreso than we seem to be about getting into theirs. Or even, about getting more creative about what we do. And that's how companies go out of business.
Doing a "webcast" that's a lousy and dated version of your noon newscast? That's not creative. That's not going to grab someone and say, hey, that's different. But I wouldn't put it past the kids in Vegas from getting that reaction. Yeah, sure, their motto is "News Never Looked So Good." There's that part of the equation. I get that. But there's something else. There's a creativity here that I haven't seen coming from TV stations.
Take a look at the winners of the Knight Foundation's 2009 News Challenge. No call letters among the bunch. But a LOT of creative, multi-platform, forward-thinking ideas about taking information and getting it in front of people, instead of sitting back on our broadcast bottoms and continuing to think the audience will just keep coming to us.

The Knight Foundation Voters Decide in Miami: Local TV? Not on the Table.
Eric Umansky and Scott Klein of ProPublica, and Aaron Pilhofer and Ben Koski of The New York Times won $719,500 to bankroll a project aimed at enriching investigative news reports by creating an easily searchable, free, public online database of public records. (As Jeff Jarvis would say, that's asking "What Would Google Do?)
Gail Robinson at the Gotham Gazette won $250,000 to create an online wiki devoted to local legislators' voting records and campaign contributions, so voters in New York can go someplace--free--and find usable information.
And in Phoenix, Aleksandra Chojnacka and Adam Klawonn of the Daily Phoenix won $95,000 to fund their idea of using news, games and social networking to help commuters on the city's light rail system informed about their city.
Where's the proof broadcasters get it? Where's the creativity that shows we will endure, succeed and prosper five years from now? Skype liveshots? Anchor blogs? Weather widgets?
Folks. The Buick dealer isn't coming back on a white horse to save you. What are you doing to change?